![]() I mean, I understand the part about them applying some process to compensate for the changes in color profile, but why when they apply that process they make the picture brighter than it really looks, especially when my Windows installation doesn't have any color profile assigned to the display. The part I'm still not getting is why Firefox and IE9 show all the pictures with a brighter gamma than what I see in Lightroom. I'll read that blog later today or tomorrow when I have time to give it proper attention. Also, if Firefox and IE9 support color management, so as you said in an earlier post, they're supposed to compensate for the different color profiles, then why the different versions show a different gamma when uploaded to imgur? But here's what I have trouble wrapping my head around: if Picasa Web strips the color profiles, then why Google Chrome shows the photo that was exported with ColorMatch RGB darker than the one with sRGB? If Picasa Web stripped the profiles, then the different versions should look the same across different browsers, whether they support color management or not. Picasa Web strips the profile, therefore all the versions of the photo, regardless of what color profile I assigned on export, look the same. So let's assume for a moment that's the case. You say that Picasa Web may be stripping the embedded color profile from the picture. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |